La nomination de Trump à la justice est inconstitutionnelle

En remplaçant Jeff Sessions par Matthew Whitaker le président Trump contourne la constitution. Non seulement l'individu a un passé trouble, mais le sénat ne s'est jamais prononcé sur sa nomination. Les Républicains fermeront-ils les yeux sur une nouvelle attaque que l'esprit ou le contenu d'un des documents les plus importants pour les Américains? Un des co-signataires de ce texte publié dans le New York Times aujourd'hui est l'époux de la conseillère du président Kellyanne Conway.

 "It means that Mr. Trump’s installation of Matthew Whitaker as acting attorney general of the United States after forcing the resignation of Jeff Sessions is unconstitutional. It’s illegal. And it means that anything Mr. Whitaker does, or tries to do, in that position is invalid.

Much of the commentary about Mr. Whitaker’s appointment has focused on all sorts of technical points about the Vacancies Reform Act and Justice Department succession statutes. But the flaw in the appointment of Mr. Whitaker, who was Mr. Sessions’s chief of staff at the Justice Department, runs much deeper. It defies one of the explicit checks and balances set out in the Constitution, a provision designed to protect us all against the centralization of government power.

If you don’t believe us, then take it from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, whom Mr. Trump once called his “favorite” sitting justice. Last year, the Supreme Court examined the question of whether the general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board had been lawfully appointed to his job without Senate confirmation. The Supreme Court held the appointment invalid on a statutory ground."

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/opinion/trump-attorney-general-sessions-unconstitutional.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage