Débat Sanders vs Clinton à New York: et puis?

De toutes les analyses du débat lues ce matin, j'ai retenu celle de Chris Cillizza. Il résume plutôt bien mes impressions. Non seulement Sanders devait rivaliser avec Hillary Clinton, mais il devait faire plus, il devait espérer un K.O.. Vrai que Sanders a le sens de la formule et que Mme Clinton peine à inspirer la passion, mais le candidat progressiste ne maîtrise pas ses dossiers et Hillary lui a même fait la leçon à quelques reprises. Nous saurons mardi ce que les électeurs de l'état de New York en pensent.

 "Most importantly, Clinton drove home -- again and again -- the idea that Sanders talked a good game but couldn't back it up. "It's easy to diagnose the problem," she said at one point. "It's harder to do something about the problem." That's her broader argument in this race -- what Sanders says sounds nice but can't be done -- and she did yeoman's work in making sure anyone watching understood that.

No, she wasn't perfect in the Brooklyn debate. Clinton continues to be evasive and unconvincing when it comes to her refusal to release the transcripts of her paid speeches to Goldman Sachs. The idea that the Republicans running for president need to release any paid speeches they gave before Clinton will do the same is a cop out. Period.%% But, Clinton came into the debate ahead in New York and the race more broadly. Nothing that happened on Thursday night will change that."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/04/14/winners-and-losers-from-the-9th-democratic-presidential-debate/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_thefix-1135pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory