Obamacare devant la Cour suprême: les juges meilleurs que l'avocat principal!

Une situation étonnante... Comment expliquer que l'avocat en charge de ce dossier ne soit pas aussi articulé que les trois juges mentionnées dans l'article. Très intéressant.

 "The Obama administration’s top legal advocate was pilloried Tuesday for offering a less-than-eloquent constitutional defense of the health care reform law’s individual mandate — the provision at the heart of the challenge to “Obamacare.” Thankfully for supporters of the law, some of the sharpest legal minds in the country unintentionally articulated his case better than he did — the justices themselves. Liberal-leaning justices on the court each stepped in at various points to suggest arguments for the mandate’s legitimacy. Here are the four best arguments they made — or at least hinted at — that could sway their skeptical colleagues."

 Lien pour les arguments:
  http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/03/liberal-justices-pick-up-obama-lawyers-slack-in-defense-of-mandate.php?ref=fpnewsfeed