vendredi 27 janvier 2017

Des éditorialistes s'opposent à Trump sur la question de la frontière avec le Mexique

Donald Trump a tellement insisté sur de présumés problèmes avec le Mexique pendant la dernière campagne qu'il n'a d'autres choix que d'honorer ses promesses. Cela signifie-t-il qu'il gère bien la situation et que les mesures envisagées dans la dernière semaine soient appropriées? Si les faits comptent encore, le Président républicain fait fausse route.

"The president has promised from the very beginning of his campaign that the border wall would be paid for not by U.S. taxpayers but by the Mexican government. Peña Nieto has been unflinching in his response, insisting at every turn that under no circumstances will Mexico pay for the wall. As a means of extracting payment, White House press secretary Sean Spicer suggested Thursday that the U.S. might levy a 20 percent tax on all Mexican imports, though he later pulled back that assertion.

Such a move would require the U.S. to back out of the North American Free Trade Agreement, a trade deal that Trump railed against on the campaign trail and has pledged either to renegotiate or to leave entirely. Extricating the U.S. from NAFTA could have severe economic consequences, threatening continent-wide supply chains fostered by North American free trade over the past 23 years and with them, the millions of American jobs that depend on exporting goods to Canada and Mexico.

Imposing such an import on Mexican goods, the Times noted, could create a shortage of fresh fruits and vegetables in American grocery stores and drive up the price of many other consumer goods made in Mexico. Ultimately, the Times’ editorial board wrote, “a tax on Mexican imports would be paid by American consumers and businesses that buy those goods. Americans would pay for the wall, not Mexicans.”

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire