"In managing his Vietnam problem, Lyndon Johnson exercised both very strong and very weak leadership. The combination had disastrous results. For more than a year and a half, the president steered clear of the massive intervention his advisers favored. Had he stuck to his guns, America might have avoided its biggest 20th-century foreign policy failure. Still, if he was going to yield eventually, it might have been smart to do so sooner. Waiting worsened his problem. By the time he gave up, he needed to do something very big.
As we remember Vietnam, we’re likely to be tough on Johnson, and we should be. But we should not spare his advisers. McNamara, Bundy, Taylor, Rusk, and Westmoreland got their boss to go to war by joining arms and telling him he had no choice. Their consensus proved brief. Once the war effort foundered, they began to disagree. They no longer had a single prescription. And the president—who in July 1965 had let others write his policy for him—no longer knew what to do."
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/03/lyndon-johnson-vietnam-115825.html?ml=m_b3_1#.VP8AuPmG81I
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire