Débat Kaine-Pence: un gagnant?

Je partage l'essentiel de cette analyse. Faut-il vraiment perpétuer cette "tradition" d'un débat entre les candidat à la Vie-présidence? Elaine Quijano pouvait-elle assurer de meilleures relances et de meilleurs échanges? S'il faut déterminer un gagnant, j'irais également pour le républicain Mike Pence parce que c'est sur ses épaules que se retrouvait le plus lourd fardeau. Si on ne peut parler d'une performance éblouissante sur le fond, il est parvenu à se présenter comme un candidat sérieux et une option viable.

 Voici un extrait de la critique de la performance de Tim Kaine:

"Tim Kaine: Someone must have told the Virginia senator he needed to always be on his front foot in the debate, always be the aggressor. It didn't work. Kaine started the debate talking so quickly and trying to load so many Trump attacks into every answer that it made it virtually impossible to grasp any one attack. In the middle of the debate, Kaine seemed to relax into it — delivering an effective attack on Trump's comments on women. But that Kaine was the exception, not the rule. When he wasn't trying to stuff 10 pounds of attack in a five-pound bag in his answers, he was relentlessly interrupting Pence. Every single time Pence started to level an attack against Hillary Clinton, Kaine immediately began to talk over him. I'm not sure if that was on purpose or not, but it didn't come across well — at all. One glaring example: As Pence was recounting his personal experience on Sept. 11, 2001, Kaine interrupted to say, "I was in Virginia." Um, okay. Not a good look."

  https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/04/winners-and-losers-from-the-vice-presidential-debate/?tid=pm_politics_pop_b